Audrey Petersen (
mislabeled) wrote in
knightsoflegend2017-05-13 12:39 am
london trial ♔ i guess i'll save the best for last

WHO ||Lydia, Sark, Francesca, Cora, Will, Sam, Lila, Carol, Rose, Sydney, Dean, Audrey, Grant [Closed]
WHAT || Audrey Petersen is tried for her involvement in the schemes of Nicholas St. Andrew
WHERE || London, England
WHEN || June 2017
HOW || Actionspam. Single thread, don't worry about maintaining tagging order.
They're calling it one of the trials of the year. Some of the more hyperbolic tabloids have referred to it as the "trial of the decade" or even "of the new century".
Audrey Petersen, wealthy socialite and wife of Professor Grant Petersen, curator of the Knights' archives has been involved in an extended proceeding ever since the day that the Knights and the London police stopped Nicholas St. Andrew, a charismatic cult leader, from completing a dark occult ritual. St. Andrew was killed in the assault, but Audrey was taken prisoner, her role in the business less black and white. She now stands trial for the crimes she allegedly committed with her former mentor. The authorities are still uncertain as to whether Audrey was a willing accomplice or just another of St. Andrew's brainwashed cultist lackeys. Her lawyers and the popular press have taken to painting her as a victim, but Wynn is hardly so sure. Dozens of people, including prominent citizens have said they are willing to appear as character witnesses for her, and some have even been obliquely criticizing the work the authorities did in arresting her. Many of the Knights who were involved in thwarting the Children of Chaos have been asked to come to the trial to provide more insight into the situation.
Police chief Jared O'Keefe paces nervously outside the doors as they arrive, rubbing his mouth with one hand.
"Oh good. You made it. Now, we've insisted on no cameras anywhere nearby - we want to preserve the sanctity of the Knights' secrecy as much as possible. The attorneys have a ... bit of a history. They've sparred in the courtroom many a time. I believe the plan is to call you up on the stand in small groups."

no subject
[While everything about her body language says this is not great, that part she actually did mean. If she has to go up in a group, that means there's less of a chance for her, specifically, having to talk. Her hand fidgets on the edge of the blazer meant to make her look presentable and professional before she continues.]
We just have to say what happened, right?
no subject
[ Because this seems like a serious breach of secrecy, no matter how you look at it. ]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
sworn in
if your character intends to bend some truth, please leave a bluff check. if they want to sell their legitimate honesty, you can leave a diplomacy check. ]
no subject
no subject
no subject
got super fucking luckyreads as an incredibly straight shooter (diplomacy nat 20, 22 total). Apparently the tiny teenage girl thing works for her with the jury.]no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
the petersen counterstrike group
prosecution question 1
"When was the first time you met the defendant?" ]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
prosecution question 2
(no subject)
prosecution question 3
(no subject)
(no subject)
defense question 1
"Did you see the defendant remove any valuable items from the Petersen penthouse on the night of the hostage crisis?" ]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
defense question 2
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
defense question 3
(no subject)
(no subject)
blood sugar group
prosecution question 1
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
prosecution question 2
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
prosecution question 3
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
defense question 1
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
defense question 2
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
defense question 3
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
the final feast group
prosecution question 1
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
prosecution question 2
(no subject)
prosecution question 3
(no subject)
defense question 1
(no subject)
defense question 2
(no subject)
defense question 3
(no subject)
dead of winter group
prosecution question 1
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
prosecution question 2
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
prosecution question 3
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
defense question 1
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
defense question 2
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
defense question 3
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
closing arguments
finally, audrey herself is called to the stand. she swears to tell the truth, looking calm and collected, before explaining her side of things. carlson's questions help her play the victim, and by the end of it, she is nearly in tears as she looks over at grant. ] I was a pawn in that horrible man's game. I didn't understand what was happening, and he turned me against my own husband. I just want this to be over, so I can have my life back.
[ mcgregory's questions are met with bold faced denials from audrey, and she manages to verbally evade any admissions of guilt or even implications. however, by the time he finishes, a sense motive of 10 or more can easily read the expressions on the jury's faces - they seem pretty convinced that she is guilty.
the attorneys move on to make their closing statements, the seemingly interminable q&a finally over, but it appears that audrey has lost interest in the proceedings. her focus grows distant, her eyelids shudder, and a spot check of 20+ catches that she appears to be muttering to herself. ]
no subject
What's with the Cuckoo's Nest?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
init plurk incoming
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
1/2
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
1/2
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...